I want to start this section off with the Government’s video evidence. The first video was released in early 2002, and the second video was released in May 2006. The second video was only released due to pressure put on the Government by Judicial Watch.
Video 1: The attack happens 22 seconds into the first video.
Video 2: The attack happens 1:26 into the second video.
For frame-by-frame pictures of each these videos, click here.
In both these articles, they plainly state repeatedly that these show a plane hitting the Pentagon…well, where is the plane? Do they think if they say something enough times with enough confidence that people will just automatically imagine a plane in that footage? Supposedly you can “clearly” see the nose cone of a plane in the second video according to Fox News. I’m sure you can see the cone of some object coming at the Pentagon, but it sure isn’t a plane.
Have you ever seen any pictures showing anything resembling a plane at the crash site? I know I haven’t, and I ask for anyone who has to please send me the picture(s) they have.
Another odd fact to note is that the “plane” hit the only part of The Pentagon that was being upgraded to protect against that kind of attack.
Luck — if it can be called that — had it that the terrorists aimed the Boeing 757 at the only part of the Pentagon that already had been renovated in an 11-year, $1.3 billion project meant to bolster it against attack. That significantly limited the damage and loss of life by slowing the plane as it tore through the building and reducing the explosion’s reach. – USAToday
Donald Rumsfeld, at the time of the attack, was on the exact opposite side of The Pentagon, in his office. He keeps a piece of the wreckage in his office as a reminder of the day as well. As you may know, he’s one of the main people behind the “Project for a New America” where they openly say they need a “new Pearl Harbor” for a revolutionary change in America.
The Project for a New American Century, a neo-conservative think tank whose members include Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Jeb Bush and Paul Wolfowitz, releases their report entitled “Rebuilding America’s Defenses.”
In it, they declare that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.” (Page 50-51)
To see a step-by-step analysis of the Pentagon attack from Loose Change: Second Edition, click here.